Divorce Different

by Jef Henninger, Esq. Serving all of New Jersey.

Tevis Claims in a New Jersey Divorce Complaint

Posted by jefhenninger on October 17, 2010

Tevis Claims in new Jersey Divorce Cases

In 1979 the New Jersey Supreme Court decided the case of Janina Tevis v. Michael Tevis.   Janina Tevis divorced her husband Michael, and then sued him for physical abuse that she suffered during the marriage.  A jury believed her testimony and awarded her $35,000 for her injuries.  However, Michael appealed and the Supreme Court overturned the verdict, and took away her award. The New Jersey Supreme Court said she should have brought the action for assault and battery as part of her divorce under the Entire Controversy Doctrine.   Because she waited and filed a separate complaint against her husband after the divorce, she was denied any recovery.  As a result, we now have “Tevis Claims” in New Jersey.

A spouse may seek damages for financial or physical/personal injury or abuse sustained during the marriage (or civil union).  This Tevis claim is filed together with the divorce complaint.  Depending on the case, the court may separate the two actions into two cases for separate trials or it could keep it together.  This means that the divorce case is presented to a judge for a bench trial where the judge makes the decision on all the normal divorce issues. The civil claim for monetary or personal injury is then is tried to a jury. Though they are eventually separated for trial, the claims must be filed together initially so that they are not barred by a legal theory called “Entire Controversy Doctrine” (like what happened with Mrs. Tevis).  The Doctrine applies to many cases and it holds that all claims a person may have against another must be filed in the same complaint.

Clearly, filing a Tevis claim starts the case off on a nasty foot.  Only an experienced New Jersey Divorce Attorney can advise you if this is the right move for your case.  You will have to decide what you really want.  Do you want to end the case quick and for as little money as possible?  Or do you want an all out war that will get expensive?  While many people opt for the quick and cheap route, there are some cases where filing a Tevis claim as part of the divorce complaint may be the right move.  Keep in mind that many Tevis claims are often dropped as part of settlement negotiations. 

Essex County Divorce Lawyers

Posted in Articles | Tagged: , , | Leave a Comment »

New Websites

Posted by jefhenninger on August 1, 2010

http://www.unioncountydivorceattorney.com

http://www.essexcountydivorceattorney.com

http://www.somersetcountydivorceattorney.com

http://www.burlingtoncountydivorceattorney.com

http://www.atlanticcountydivorceattorney.com

http://www.middlesexcountycriminaldefenseattorney.com

http://www.njdyfsattorney.com

http://www.thenewarkcriminaldefenseattorney.com

http://www.somersetcountydefenselawyers.com

http://www.morriscountydefenselawyers.com

http://www.unioncountydefenselawyers.com
http://www.hudsoncountydefenselawyers.com

http://www.essexcountyattorney.com

http://www.passaiccountydefenselawyers.com

Posted in Misc | Leave a Comment »

Look for an attorney that discusses ways to save money

Posted by jefhenninger on July 22, 2010

The other attorney in one of my new divorce cases really made me  laugh.  My client has little assets, a ton of liabilities and a business that has been getting hit hard in this economy.  However, it seems like the other side has convinced this attorney that my client has a ton of money.  As a result, he charged a huge retainer and has already done a ton of work on the case before my client even had a chance to file an Answer.  Besides a ton of unnecessary information in the Complaint itself, he filed a motion and sent out a ton of subpoenas right away.  Of course, he made no attempt to try to resolve this case with my client.  There was also no reason why he couldn’t wait until the normal discovery process got under way to get the documents he requested.

I’ve dealt with this guy before and in my opinion, this is the typical situation where the attorney took a big retainer is attempting to blow through it as soon as possible so he can get more.  As soon as the money runs out, I am sure the attorney will pack up shop and head out.  If he does stay on the case and continues to run up a bill, he’ll probably sue his client to get the money.  Its really sad because it gives the rest of us a bad name.

If you really want to buy your attorney a new fancy car, go ahead and find one of these attorneys.  If you want to save money, look for an attorney that gives you options including options to save you money.  For example, one of my other divorce clients wanted to file for adultery.  I explained to him that there was nothing for him to accomplish and that it could cost him about another $200 just to file it that way but that I would do whatever he wanted.  He realized that it didn’t make any sense to do that so he opted for the cheaper alternative.  That’s what I do with all of my clients.  If your attorney does not help you save money, chances are, you will be wasting a lot of it.

Posted in Articles | Tagged: | 3 Comments »

Your attorney’s fancy office could cost you

Posted by jefhenninger on July 22, 2010

I like to go to other attorney’s offices and compare them to mine, especially the big firms.  As the owner of my own firm, I know where every cent goes.  So, when I’m at someone else’s office, I like to add up the cost of setting up and running that office.  Sometimes, I’m blown away by how fancy and exotic these offices are.  I also don’t understand the point.  Maybe if you are in a big city and you have major corporations as clients, you need to impress them, but for the average client, does it really matter?  My office is nice and modern but fancy?  Hardly.  I also don’t drive a fancy card.  Its not that I don’t have the money, its just that I don’t see the point.

Lets say I spend $100,000 on a really fancy office space.  Does that make me a better attorney?  Does a jury, a judge or the other attorney care?  Will they even know?  Not at all.  So, why should you care what your attorney does with their money?  In my opinion, this should be a major issue because you are paying for your attorney’s overhead.  As attorneys, we do not have products to sell; only time.  The more overhead we have, the more time we have to bill.  When you run out of time to sell, you sell your time for more money.  In other words, you raise your hourly rates. 

My costs are razor thin.  I run a very efficient office and I have 8 office locations in New Jersey.  However, I have hunted for value as if my life depends on it.  As a result, of keeping my costs low, I probably have better margins than almost any other attorney.  Thus, I can also keep my hourly rates low.  In turn, I can be more accessible to other people who wouldn’t otherwise be able to afford me if my rate was $100 more per hour.  So, when you go to an attorney’s office and you are impressed by all the glitzy (and unnecessary) furniture and accessories, keep in mind that you paid for it!

Posted in Articles | Tagged: | Leave a Comment »

An oral agreement is not worth the paper its printed on

Posted by jefhenninger on July 22, 2010

I know a lot of people who have never have to go to court.  In fact, some unmarried parents who are no longer together have never been to court to deal with the issues associated with their children.  For most of them, they never have to as they can communicate like adults and rely on oral agreements.  However, these oral agreements can really blow up in your face.  When it comes to major issues such as custody, child support and college expenses, paying a few hundred dollars to have an attorney make the agreement ironclad may be money well spent.

Consider the case of Tracy L who I represented a few years ago.  She had a five year old child with a man that she never married.  When they split, she took custody and they worked out oral agreements on everything.  Years passed and they never stepped foot in a courtroom.  However, a major dispute occurred and the father refused to return the child when his scheduled visitation ended.  My client called the police and when they asked for the court order that granted her custody, she had nothing to show them.  As a result, they couldn’t help her.  Both parties filed emergent motions and spent a lot of money on attorneys.  Sometimes possession really is nine-tenths of the law as the court didn’t see a problem with the father keeping the child for another week until the parties can show up to court with their attorneys.  At court, I knew that we had to get the child back that day or we would lose him forever.  Even though the judge initially said that she would give the child to the father, I was able to get the judge to change her mind and give the child back to my client.  We returned to court about a month later for the full custody hearing and, as expected, the judge stayed with her initial ruling. 

Of course, my client could have avoided a ton of stress and a ton of money if she had just hired an attorney to work out a consent order that was filed with the court.  While the father could have still made a push for custody, he would have faced an uphill battle.  In addition, the police would have likely enforced the order.  Call me anytime if you would like to have me draft a consent order for you.

Posted in Articles | Tagged: | Leave a Comment »

Is your attorney looking out for you or his/her wallet?

Posted by jefhenninger on July 20, 2010

A client just came into my office a domestic violence matter involving her boyfriend.  She explained how she got divorced last year so I assumed she didn’t have an attorney since she was in my office.  However, she did have an attorney that handles a fair number of divorce cases in Monmouth County.  So, I had to ask, why can’t he help you?  The answer:  “because he ripped me off and he’s a scumbag”.  Not the first time I’ve heard that about him.  She explained that she had a very simple case with everything worked out.  However, this attorney somehow charged her $8000 for a 3 month divorce case!  My guess is that I could have handled the case for under $2000.  Regardless, she clearly knows that she was ripped off and unfortunately, her story is not rare. 

What this attorney does not realize is that while he might have made some nice money, he will never make a dime off of this client.  Not only that, but she will clearly bad mouth him to everyone she knows.  I try to create clients for life even it costs me money.  I believe that my job is to get the best result for my client even if it does not put money in my pocket.

For example, I have been representing a client with a number of related issues.  I was going to represent her in the divorce but we would have had to wait months if not over a year for her to have even the proper retainer put together because her husband was going to cause World War 3.  No matter who handled the case, it was going to be expensive.  This just couldn’t wait.  Thus, I found an attorney that is affiliated with an organization that can help her.  As a result, the divorce case will cost her next to nothing and she will be able to get divorced much quicker.  I lost out on a lot of money but my client is in a better position.  In my opinion, that is my real job: to help my clients.  Quite often, it puts money in my pocket.  However, sometimes it doesn’t.  Either way, I love my career and I feel great knowing that I made a difference in someone’s life.

Am I the only attorney that feels like this?   Obviously no, but when looking for an attorney, I suggest you try to determine what your attorney is concerned with, you or his/her wallet?

Posted in Articles | Tagged: | Leave a Comment »

Factor in the risks and costs of not settling your case

Posted by jefhenninger on July 20, 2010

When you are in settlement discussions, you have a lot of factors to consider.  One of which is the cost of  not settling your case.  As I always tell most of my clients, do not assume the other side with pay your legal bills.  Think about your best case scenario.  What will it cost to get there?  $10,000?  $20,000?  $50,000.  Thus, if you can boil your best case scenario down to a dollar figure, subtract it by what it will cost to get there.   How does that compare to what is on the table?  Once you factor that in, the numbers may get you much closer to a settlement.

Besides the cost of the trial, what is the cost of losing?  Take the same costs that you used above and now subtract that from your worst case scenario.  Looks real ugly huh?  Not only did you lose but it cost you a fortune to get there.  What will it cost you over time to live with those results?  How does that compare to what is on the table? 

Money isn’t everything

Besides money, is a trial really worth the stress and bad blood that it will create?   Is that what you really want out of life?  Would it be better to give up a little and have everything done or would you rather risk a ton of money and incur a lot of stress and time away from the rest of your life be dragging out the litigation?  Take a step back and determine what really makes you happy in life.

Posted in Articles | Tagged: | Leave a Comment »

Does divorce mediation in New Jersey really save you money?

Posted by jefhenninger on July 20, 2010

Before I was an attorney, I was a mediator for 2 years.  It was a great experience and I am a better attorney as a result of the experience.  However, I am rather upset by all of the “divorce mediation” springing up everywhere as some type of alternative to divorce.  In my opinion, it is not a good alternative to the divorce process and may actually make your case more expensive and time consuming.

Is it really an alternative to divorce?

There is a big public misconception that divorce has to be expensive, drawn out and in essence, a generally horrible experience.  Divorce Mediation is marketed as a way to bypass all of that but of course, relies on people thinking that this misconception is true.  There is  no one way to get divorced.  I can get people divorced in two to three months for $2000 or less in some cases.  Some people spend six figures and it takes years.  The timing and the cost of a divorce depends upon you and your spouse.  Thus, it does not have to be expensive. 

Besides the cost aspect, divorce mediation also assumes that there are no other alternatives to a divorce trial.  However, a divorce trial is very rare.  Almost every case settles.  One of the reasons most cases settle (besides lack of time for court to try the cases) is that there are a number of mediations and other ADR processes built in to the divorce process.  In addition, your attorney is always free to set up mediation sessions with the other side with or without the assistance of an actual mediator.  When it is without a mediator, we refer to this as a four-way conference.  During the four-way, both sides along with their respective attorneys discuss all of the issues in an attempt to settle all or just part of the issues in the case.

Regardless of how and when the case settles, your attorney will be in a position to quickly put through the settlement.  When you go through mediation and you have settled the cases, you still have to start the divorce case from the beginning.  This could delay the case.

Who will fight for you?

A mediator cannot represent you or your spouse.  Thus, you may lose out on key legal advice that could cost you for many years.  For example, what if there is two ways to do something?  One way will cost you more money, the other will not.  What if the mediator thinks it is better for your spouse to go the way that costs you more money even if does not mean less money for them?  What if you want to draw up an iron clad agreement that will be in your favor?  Who is looking out for you?  Don’t think that your spouse’s attorney will pick up on all of these little issues.  I’ve seen some very experienced attorneys leave money on the table by not asking for certain things.  With a mediator, he/she may not raise these issues if they are in your favor or they may raise them for the benefit of your spouse. 

Can an attorney speed up your divorce?

While there is no one way to mediate a case, I’ve seen some mediations that took about 10 to 12 different mediation sessions.  However, when I have represented clients and I have been in some type of mediation, it rarely takes more than one session which generally lasts one to three hours.  Why?  Attorneys know how to cut through the BS.  During the initial consultation with my clients, I am already getting an idea for how the client wants to settle the case and how I think the case should settle.  I explain my thinking to my clients from the start so they are prepared to move forward.  As a result, the sessions go much quicker.  With a mediation, I am sure the mediator has to discuss every possible option on each issue which can take some time.

The best of both worlds

The purpose of this blog is to demonstrate that there are attorneys out there that combine the best of both worlds.  You can get an attorney that will fight for you without breaking the bank.  In addition, for the same price as a mediation, hiring the right attorney can get you divorced faster and with a better settlement agreement that is drawn up correctly.  If the mediation fails, the right attorney can transition right into litigation mode to fight for you.  No mediator can do that.  So, think twice before you opt for an alleged “divorce alternative” as it may not really be much of an alternative at all.

Posted in Articles | Tagged: | Leave a Comment »

Do you need a litigator or an agitator?

Posted by jefhenninger on July 20, 2010

I know a divorce attorney that many people refer to as a “bulldog”.  The alleged reputation is that this is attorney is tough and will fight for his/her clients.  Based upon my experience with this attorney, this dog is all bark and no bite.  I’ve gone up against him/her and won and it was hardly a challenge.  He/She caved quite quickly.  So why the reputation?  My guess is that it is all about attitude because the attorney talks a good game and is loud and quite obnoxious.  There are other attorneys that have similar traits and I call them agitators.  Regardless of whether or not they have any skill, they don’t seem to use it all the time.  Instead, its all about being loud and causing problems. Some people want their attorney to be a big pain in the ass so they fill a market for a hard-charging attorney.

However, what people don’t realize is that this type of attorney can cause more problems than they solve which can cost you a ton of money.  In my opinion, a true litigator knows that for all of his or her trial skill, quite often, what gets the job done is knowing what to say and how to say it.  Sometimes this is the screaming and yelling that is seen in the movies and on TV but most of the time, it is skilled diplomacy.  As the old saying goes, “you catch more flies with honey”.  So, your attorney can be aggressive and fight for you without upsetting the world in the process.   This is what I do because, in my opinion, I can get better results for less cost to my clients.

Posted in Articles | Tagged: | 2 Comments »

Hiring a divorce lawyer does not mean that the case must be difficult and expensive

Posted by jefhenninger on February 10, 2010

I’ve met many people that are concerned that if they hire an attorney, they must enter into complex, difficult, expensive and lengthy litigation that will start off with accusing their spouse of every horrible thing imaginable. This cannot be farther from the truth.

A good divorce attorney can work to resolve your case quickly and without great expense to either you or your spouse.  Hopefully, this blog has made that rather clear which is its purpose.  As the client, you are the boss and you should be able to direct your divorce lawyer as to what you want him or her to do.  So, if you want your divorce lawyer to be a bull dog, he or she will do that.  If you want your lawyer to act as a type of mediator, he or she should do that as well.

The problem is when the lawyer doesn’t want to listen to you.  This is rather common. Thus, when selecting a good divorce lawyer, you need to make sure that the lawyer will work for you and not against you.  I tell my clients that right up front so they don’t have to ask.

Posted in Articles | Tagged: | Leave a Comment »

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.