Divorce Different

by Jef Henninger, Esq. Serving all of New Jersey.

Archive for January 16th, 2010

Break the log jam by pushing it to the side

Posted by jefhenninger on January 16, 2010

A settlement negotiation is often like putting a puzzle together.  You have all of these pieces that have to eventually fit together and when the puzzle is solved, the case is over.  When there are many pieces left to put together, one of them can bog down the entire case.  As a result, nothing gets accomplished and the puzzle is not even close to completion.  In other words, there is a log jam.

The funny thing about log jams is that they are often not the most important issue to the case, at least to a rationale observer.  Instead, they are often one of the most emotional issues in the case and thus, you have a fairly unimportant issue bogging down the case. Of course, there are times when the most major issue is holding up the case.

Regardless of why the log jam exists, it has to be cleared or the case will drag on.  Some puzzle pieces are linked to each other.  In other words, you’ll only give up one piece in exchange for another.  So, in order to break the log jam you first need to figure out what pieces are related to the piece that is causing the jam.  If you cannot separate these pieces, they are also part of the log jam.

Once you have figured out the real problem spots, see what is left on the table.  Push the log jam to the side and work out those issues.  If you can start to agree on the balance of the issues you will both see that the two of you can come to an agreement without going through World War 3.  Hopefully, this will create some momentum so that when the only issues left are the log jam issues, you will re-examine your original position on these tough issues.

While it may not work every time, I have seen time and time again how those tough issues that threatened to derail the whole case became complete non-issues once the parties have pushed it aside for a while only to return to it after having worked through the other issues in the case.  

There are any number of reasons for why this occurs, but one explanation is that the more two people fight about an issue, the more they dig in their heals.  Instead of fighting over an asset in the divorce case, they are actually just fighting each other.  Conceding their position in anyway is a sign that the other party beat them down into submission because they are weak which neither side wants, so the fight continues. 

Pushing the log jam to the side stops the fight and shows both parties that they can work together to come to an agreement.  Now that emotions and nerves are calm, they can re-examine their positions from a rationale posture.

Posted in Articles | Tagged: | Leave a Comment »

The Cost of a New Jersey Divorce

Posted by jefhenninger on January 16, 2010

When it comes to divorce, there is one question that everyone asks no matter what their situation is.  How much will my divorce cost?  In other words, how much will your final bill be?  It is a question that is impossible to answer. 

Many people get concerned due to the horror stories that they have heard from friends and family about how they spent tens of thousands of dollars in legal fees associated with their New Jersey divorce case.  In my opinion, it is unethical to give any type of estimate since there is no way that I can predict the future as to what you will do and what your spouse and his/her lawyer will do.  There are just too many variables.

If you believe that you need a lawyer for your divorce, then you cannot escape some legal fees.  I tell my clients several things to give them a few ideas about what the final bill may look like.  First, our goal is to get the best possible result for the best possible price.  I think this only makes sense because if you spend $30,000 to fight over something that is worth $10,000, you are out $20,000.  That was not a great result in the end was it?

I also explain that we are looking to set up life-long relationships with our clients.  We want to be the go-to lawyers for all of your legal needs for you and your family.  We can’t exactly do this if you feel that your bill was artificially inflated.  Thus, we have a long-term financial interest in keeping your bill reasonable.

Furthermore, I teach my clients how to save money.  Some of those tips are on this blog.  Who else does this?  Not too many lawyers that I know.  Finally, I explain that a majority of my divorce cases settle for less than what another lawyer may take as an initial retainer.

In the end, while I cannot guarantee a final cost, I can assure them that my office will do whatever it takes to make sure that at the end of the case, they will feel that my representation was not only worth the money, but that the cost was reasonable.

Posted in Articles | Tagged: | Leave a Comment »

Getting your spouse to pay for your lawyer

Posted by jefhenninger on January 16, 2010

It seems like no one ever wants to pay for their own divorce lawyer.  I often get asked if the other spouse can reimburse them for counsel fees.  Since almost every case settles, that is something the other side would have to agree to.  I suggest you speak to your lawyer about that but it rarely happens.

The more important issue is what to do if you cannot afford a lawyer because your spouse is the one with all the money.  In New Jersey, you can file a motion (through a lawyer or on your own) to have the Court order your spouse to pay for your counsel fees subject to equitable distribution.  That means that while the spouse must give you the money now, you may have to pay that back, usually via an offset, at final settlement. 

Of course, if your spouse already has a lawyer, the best course of action may be to have your prospective lawyer call the other lawyer to try to resolve this out of court. 

Finally, in order for all of this  to work, you must show that you cannot afford a lawyer.  Bringing this motion just because your spouse makes more than you may be a very bad idea if it is shown that you have the income/assets to afford representation.

Posted in Articles | Tagged: | Leave a Comment »

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.